Posted on Leave a comment

The Nuremberg Trials: three different types of crimes

The Nuremberg Trials- three different types of crimes
The Nuremberg Trials
The Nuremberg Trials

In the crimes section, written by Katie Jo Parris and edited by Karen Phinney, you will find a definition for the three different types of crimes that were written into the Tribunal’s constitution as punishable under law. These three crimes were the basis for the indictments. The main resource used was Calvocoressi’s Nuremberg, the Facts, the Law and the Consequences which provided the definitions and descriptions of what each crime entails. I also used Mielke, F. and A. Mitscherlich book The Death Doctors in order to clear up the misconception about medical experiments and their association with the Trials.

The Military Tribunal, in its attempt to punish the axis powers without reprimanding all of the people from those countries, was forced to develop a coherent set of laws that would bring punishment for those responsible for the atrocities that had occurred during the Holocaust. This daunting task was finally made tangible by the creation of three categories of punishable crimes. At the Nuremberg Trials, and as dictated in the Tribunal’s Constitution, the following were those things in which one could be convicted:
  • War Crimes
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Crimes against peace
Goering on trial
Goering on trial

§ War Crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment of deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity (Calvocoressi 45).

In respect to war crimes, the “Tribunal found the facts as follows: ‘The Truth remains that War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, never before seen in the history of war. They were perpetrated in all the countries occupied by Germany and on the High Seas and were attended by every conceivable circumstance of cruelty and horror’” (Calvocoressi 48).

The war crimes could be divided into “two categories: crimes against fighting men and crimes against civilians. In the first category there were included: the order to slaughter commandos to the last man even if they surrendered; the order to separate political commissars from other Russian prisoners and shoot them; ill-treatment and murder of Russian prisoners; the use of prisoners for medical experiments; the use of prisoners for labour contrary to international conventions. Against the civilian population the following crimes were proved: extermination of certain sections by organized mass murder; large scale deportation; for labour in Germany in the most shocking conditions; the taking and shooting of hostages; the economic exploitation of occupied territories over and above the needs of the occupying troops; wanton devastation of towns and villages; the plunder of works of art. The list is not exhaustive” (Calvocoressi 48)…

More often than not a crime which is a War Crime is also a Crime against Humanity and vice-versa:

§Crimes against humanity: “namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in the execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated” (Calvocoressi 57).

“The prosecution contended that Crimes against Humanity fell within the province of International Law if they were committed in preparation for or in connection with international war such as aggressive war and War Crimes. This restriction was so as to not infringe in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state merely on the grounds that it was offending against humanitarian principles” (Calvocoressi 57-58).

The plan to exterminate the Jewish race falls under the category of Crimes against Humanity. Also, experiments conducted by the Nazis fall under both categories. The experimenters were given indictments by the Military Tribunal five days after the main trials were completed in Nuremberg, but were not those twenty two members who were convicted in the actual Nuremberg Trials. The experiments include the following: (Mitscherlich, contents page).

  • Low Pressure and super cooling
  • Tests of the possibility of drinking sea-water
  • Typhus Vaccine Experiments
  • Epidemic Hepatitis Virus Research
  • Sulphonamide Tests
  • Experiments on Bone Transplantation
  • Phlegmon Experiments
  • Mustard Gas and Phosgene Experiments
  • Collection of the Skeletons of Jews
  • Euthanasia Program, ‘Direct Elimination’ and Mass Sterilization

The last category of crimes is:

§ Crimes against peace: “namely, planning, preparation, initiation, or waging a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing” (Calvocoressi 30)…

“Crimes against Peace” was a piece of legislature that was to pin point those people who were responsible for the intentional planning of inhumane actions. It describes actions considered to be those of aggressive war.

The judge considered these three categories and made clear his decisions by citing the following:

The Judgments were based on four counts of indictment:

  1. Conspiracy to commit crimes alleged in other counts;
  2. Crimes against Peace
  3. War Crimes;
  4. Crimes against Humanity.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.