Sir Isaac Netwotn’s three laws of motion. Three states of matter (solid, liquid, gas). We live on the third rock from the sun. Our metric system of measurement uses metre, litre, and gram. Morse code is a reliable system as the signal is made up of only three parts – a long ‘on’, the dash; a short ‘on’, the dot; and an ‘off’ signal. Do you know what SOS means in Morse code?
With knowledge of the harmful effects of smoking almost known by all, many people have since moved on from using cigarettes. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s report on cigarettes note how usage is at an all-time low, with just 11% of adults currently smoking, which is 1.5% lower than in 2021. However, there are still groups at higher risk of smoking, such as members of the LGBTQ community, Native Americans, and Alaska Natives—leaving them at risk for several health concerns.
While individuals do attempt to improve their health by stopping smoking, there are often stumbling blocks that make giving up the habit challenging. Almost all smokers become physically and emotionally dependent on nicotine after consistent tobacco use, so cutting off tobacco usually negatively affects their behavior, mood, and comfort due to withdrawal. When combined with other stressors, it’s easy for them to relapse into their old habits.
Quitting is not impossible but requires the correct approach. To help smokers, we list below three science-backed strategies to quit smoking:
Establish short-term and long-term goals
Before even attempting to quit, it’s essential to establish your reasons behind quitting. This can help you through tough moments when you lose motivation, especially when you face withdrawal symptoms and are tempted to relapse. Make sure to write both short-term and long-term goals when quitting, as it can serve as an outline for your quit process. For instance, a short-term goal can be to stop smoking at least 20 minutes per day, with the long-term goal of quitting for good.
Aside from your goals, it will be helpful to identify what triggers you to smoke, so you can do your best to avoid them. It might also be good to consider your “Bliss Point” — which we previously defined as the “quantity of consumption beyond which any further increase in consumption becomes less satisfying.” Ask yourself: what situations make you want to smoke? And under what circumstances are you okay with putting down your cigarette? These insights may help you create a more effective quitting plan that meets your goals.
Maximize nicotine replacement therapy
One of the best ways to help smokers quit is nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). This treatment form uses nicotine lozenges, inhalers, nasal sprays, nicotine patches, and pouches to help smokers move on from nicotine dependence. By giving lower concentrations over an extended period, smokers can control their physical symptoms of withdrawal— allowing them to better focus on the emotional aspect of ending smoking.
For smokers looking for a product with a similar mouthfeel to cigarettes, nicotine gum from Fertin Pharma. It offers a decent taste and texture, and the product is effective. According to Fertin Pharma, over 3.2 million people have reduced and quit smoking thanks to NRT doses. There are also NRT options for people looking for something more discreet, such as nicotine pouches, that are just placed under the lip. Nicotine pouch retailer Prilla features a wide selection of pouches from top brands, such as ZYN, VELO, and On! These pouches are also easy to buy in bulk online, allowing customers to save money, especially with Prilla’s free delivery promotion for orders above $50. Through the gradual use of these products, smokers can wean off nicotine and eventually quit smoking.
Seek behavioral support
Support is a necessary part of the quit process, so smokers must reach out to people in their corner. Friends and family can be a great source of help to stay on track and keep you distracted from cigarettes. However, some smokers may need to hear professional advice and guidance.
Counseling can be the best place to seek behavioral support, as most counselors can provide interventions and advice on quitting. According to a scientific review by Tobacco Induced Diseases, smokers who went through group therapy or counseling for smoking cessation were more likely to quit smoking than those without assistance. As much as 44.2% of patients who received the intervention had quit smoking after six months, which is significantly higher than the average quit rate of 8.5%. Even if you don’t have immediate access to counselors in person, there are plenty of remote options for social support, such as by telephone or remote consultation.
Quitting cigarettes is not easy, but not impossible. By following these three science-backed strategies, For more quick facts on topics in science and subject references, visit our tri-cyclopedia The Book of Threes for more concepts and information.
The Terror of Threes in the Heavens and on Earth Physicists have long explored how phenomena in groups of three can sow chaos. A new three-body problem, they warn, could lead to not only global races for new armaments but also thermonuclear war.
By William J. Broad June 26, 2023 | Updated 1:52 p.m. ET
Isaac Newton was baffled. He was already famous for discovering how gravity holds the universe together and for using that knowledge to predict the movements of celestial bodies, such as the moon’s path around the Earth. Now, by taking the sun’s gravitational tugs into account, he sought to improve his lunar predictions. Instead, it made them worse.
The setback, Newton’s friend Edmond Halley reported, “made his head ache, and kept him awake so often, that he would think of it no more.” Newton felt his defeat so keenly that he recalled it more than once in his old age.
Today it’s called the three-body problem. Famous in science and science fiction for orbital perturbations and chaotic phenomena, it’s recently become a concern of atomic experts and military planners. As Beijing rapidly expands its nuclear arsenal, they warn that the world of atomic superpowers is about to escalate to three from two. The outcome, they add, compared with the Moscow-Washington standoff, now 70 years old, could represent a dangerous new kind of unthinkable.
The looming era could encourage “states to resort to nuclear weapons in a crisis,” Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr., a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, recently warned. He cited the natural instabilities observed by physicists and astronomers as a portent.
Experts say the tripolar age could put human survival at risk. But they also cite a number of three-body lessons from nature — starting with Newton’s — that illuminate the issue and suggest possible ways forward. So far, however, no answer stands out. The world’s nuclear thinkers are finding the knotty topic to be as intractable as it was for Newton.
“We have a conceptual problem,”
Ernest J. Moniz
“We have a conceptual problem,” said Ernest J. Moniz, a physicist who as the secretary of energy in the Obama administration oversaw the U.S. nuclear arsenal. “We’ve got to change the traditional approach of equalizing weapons or strategic delivery systems, but how to do that is still unclear.”
“Things are changing very rapidly”
France A. Córdova
France A. Córdova, an astrophysicist and past director of the National Science Foundation, said the study of three-body phenomena in the natural sciences could nonetheless help reveal the military risks. “Things are changing very rapidly,” she said. “Anything that helps in understanding that is great.”
Security-minded hawks want to expand the American arsenal in response to China’s nuclear rise and the threat of Beijing’s closing ranks with Moscow. Doves see a window for three-body downsizing. They want to break the problem into smaller and more manageable parts. For instance, they argue that Washington should deal with the two superpowers independently and seek diplomatic bonds that reinforce two-body stability.
Recently, the Biden administration called for a further simplification. Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, argued that the American response should focus less on the quantity of the nation’s nuclear arms than on their quality. To deter attacks successfully, he said in a speech, the American military has no need for arms that “outnumber the combined total of our competitors.”
